Friday, July 22, 2016

An American Childhood

Like most people, I suspect, I have a very love/hate relationship with Facebook. Right now, as we are in the midst of a presidential election cycle, it is very, VERY easy to hate FB. I weary of the utter nonsense and the hateful, lying memes that people share without a second thought. I have no problem with your opinion differing than mine (even though I'm right, of course) - what I do have a problem with is you posting things that are simply not true (and this also goes for people who DO agree with my opinion!). It's not hard to fact check things, although I realize that would get in the way of your own agenda, but please try. And after I or someone else point out said falsehood, have the good grace to remove said post. Or at least acknowledge the mistake. The world is hard enough to navigate these days. As many a meme says, you are entitled to your own opinion, of course - you are not, however, entitled to your own facts. And neither am I.

That is the dark side of FB. There is, mercifully, the bright side, the part that I love - being able to connect with friends from all facets of my life, even though we are scattered all over the globe. In my first Stitch Fix post, I referenced my friend, Katie, several times. While she calls me her oldest friend in the best sense of the term, I cannot return the favor because FB has allowed me to reconnect with Amy, who lived down the street from me when I was little little and was my best friend until I turned seven and we moved away. I actually have a post about that street that I haven't published yet - but I'm getting ahead of myself.

As I resurrect this blog, part of my motivation is to write down stories for my daughter so she will always have them. Doing it publicly like this will allow other players in these stories to add their perceptions and reminiscences, if they so choose. And it is because of FB (and the internet in general, obviously) that they will be able to do this. I started this conversation with Katie a couple of days ago, as I was writing the Stitch Fix entry, and I told her that I would start this Wednesday. So here we are. It's now Friday as it took me a couple of days to write it all.

I need to flip back to the political thing for just a sec, though. One of the popular motifs these days is that there is "real" America ('Murica) and then there is the rest of us - the lefty liberal, do gooder, communist, atheist, freedom haters who are out to destroy this country. Ugh. I will freely admit to being many of the epithets thrown at me and I wear them proudly. But it doesn't mean I hate the United States or freedom or even Christians. It doesn't mean I am not a "real" American - can we please note for a moment that the title of this whole blog is Apple Pie for Dessert? I love apple pie, I go to baseball games, and I had what was probably a very typical American childhood in the 1970's.

See how it came back around?

While I have tasked Katie with writing the actual story of how we met because she just tells it better than I do - I can tell you it involved catching caterpillars, woolly bears to be exact. When you touch those suckers, they curl up into a ball and look just like tribbles from "Star Trek."

Katie and I were two years apart (we still are - duh -  but somehow the age gap doesn't seem so meaningful as it did then); although we played together for many, many years, in my mind I am always nine and she is seven - fourth and second grades, respectively. This makes her utterly fascinating to my daughter who is currently nine. I watch my daughter now and while there is much more girl drama than I ever had at that age, I am still envious of the ease with which children can form friendships. A simple "do you want to play" and they are off and running, which was exactly how Katie and I proceeded. We both loved to read, adored music, and had vivid imaginations that we gave free rein to at every available opportunity. We spent the bulk of every summer outside, exploring the woods that ran through our back yards and culminated at the end of the cul de sac in a forest that seemed huge at the time. The cul de sac (or turnaround, as we called it then) is no longer there; when I was in high school, a road was built to connect our neighborhood with the one above it. But looking at Google maps, it appears that the woods are still alive and well - and I just did some more googling and learned something I never, ever knew - those woods actually have a name! Three Falls Woods...because, as I was about to point out, once you got inside the woods and followed the right trail, you came to the falls. We didn't go all the way out to the falls every time we went on the trails - my memory is that they were a hang out spot for teenagers at the time. I definitely remember seeing a beer ball or two when we would go!

The creek that the falls fed into ran behind the houses across the street from mine and flooded at least twice that I can remember when I lived there. The big one was in October 1981, seventh grade. I remember it started in the night and my dad came and woke us all up to see. My sister, who is four years older, thought he was waking her up to go to school so she showered and did her hair and got dressed and everything before she realized what was going on. She was pissed. I just thought it was cool. The next day, Katie and I met up and put garbage bags around our legs to wade in the water. A news truck came by and filmed us and we DID get on the air briefly. When we returned to school, someone asked me about it and was quite scornful about the garbage bags...I wasn't cool then and I'm not cool now. What can you do? This is a video compilation of news footage from the flood. However, we are not in it. I guess it wasn't Channel 3 that came by. And there seems to be a lot more footage of East Syracuse than Manlius, but it's still interesting.


Most of the time, the creek was pretty tame. We played in it and around it. There was a lot of shale in the creek, which was fun to hit with another rock and watch slice apart in a way that rocks didn't seem like they should do. Often in our outdoor adventures, we were joined by our friend, Jeremy, who lived across the street from me. They say the average person eats a pound of dirt a year - I'm fairly certain the three of us ate more than our fair share growing up. I don't think we were ever clean during the summer.

Indoors, Katie and I were enchanted by many things, among them: music, books, Muppets, Atari, Legos, Darci dolls, and a new channel on our cable system, HBO. I'll get to each of these at a future time, I hope, because they all deserve their time on the stage. But I have to say that music is my most enduring memory as it formed the framework around which we built so many of our adventures. We played most often at her house, which was a super groovy split level built in 1966, according to Zillow. The stereo and her parents' awesome record collection lived on the lower level and we spent hours upon hours listening to music, lip synching to the songs (dying of embarrassment when her brother would catch us), and weaving elaborate tales that incorporated the songs into something we just called "The Game."

"The Game" had no fixed plot line or rules. We could play it indoors or out, with or without music (although I always thought it was better with music). Our roles varied, depending on what we were obsessed with at the time. For one period of time, it was crucial that Aslan, from The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, play a role and we probably fought over who got to be Lucy and who got to be Susan (it's always better to be Lucy. Always.) We really liked Helen Keller and Annie Sullivan for a while. As we got a little older and fell in love with magazines like Teen Beat and Tiger Beat, our focus shifted more to pop culture figures and we would become Olivia Newton-John and Catherine Bach or the two girls from ABBA. We were rarely the celebrities living their regular lives (and by rarely, I mean never), but instead were having grand adventures that were usually influenced by books or movies. Some I can recall are Jaws and The Omen (we can talk about the inappropriate entertainment we consumed at another time, but I should point out here that we discovered the soundtrack to Hair at an age where none of it made sense and we tried to look the words up in the dictionary and it STILL didn't make sense...which didn't stop us from adoring it and singing it at the top of our lungs). And as I said, this was always better with music and we always found a way to work the songs into the narrative. Because when you are about to be eaten by a 20 foot great white, you should sing! Clearly, we anticipated Disaster! A Musical by about 40 years.

This is merely a start. But you have to start somewhere, right? Memory is a funny, tricky thing and I am sure I am misremembering things and others can feel free to clarify. I am also sure there are many things I am forgetting and I hope, as I said above, that others will share their stories as well.

Book Response: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone

As I relaunch this blog, I have enjoyed reading the few posts I published five years ago. In the very first post, This I Believe, I pointed out that I had put some of the reviews from another, older blog on GoodReads, but they didn't seem to make much sense out of context. I still agree with this, so I am migrating them back, bit by bit (there aren't that many of them, so it shouldn't take long). I don't really know what order I wrote them in back then, so I'm just starting with the first one I added to GoodReads, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. I don't even know how many times I've reread these books at this point because I love them so much. A couple of things to point out, though, since this was first written NINE YEARS AGO...
  • I have since acquired a British copy. Well, I guess technically it belongs to my daughter as the Easter bunny brought it to her when we spent Easter in London in 2015. It's fun to read, just to see the little differences in language. 
  • As the above would imply, E has read and loved them all. I think we might have started a little younger than seven - we began with the audio book versions, which, if you haven't listened to them, you must, must, must! They are all read by Jim Dale who is, bluntly, a genius. She moved on to reading them on her own and as she finished each book, she was allowed to see the movie version. Hermione is her favorite, which proves I am raising her right. 
  • I did a whole sermon about Harry Potter and humanist parenting at our UU church. Perhaps at some point I will post that here as well. 

So with that said, let's step back in time...

It's the summer of 2007 and the Harry Potter zeitgeist has reached its zenith (zzzzzz!). If there are original comments out there about this stuff, I'd love to see them!

Obviously, there is no need to rehash the plot of book one: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. It is a real pity, though, that the publishers didn't think Americans would gravitate to the original title: Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. It's way cooler, IMO, and I would still love to own a Brit copy of the book. I'll put that on my list along with all the American ones I also don't own.

A few thoughts on re-reading book one:
1. Lots of fun to go back to the beginning and see how many clues are around for what comes later. Maybe clues isn't exactly the right word, but it will suffice. Fun to meet everyone again for the first time.

2. Why do they never TELL any of the adults what is going on? So many things could be avoided if they'd just confide in someone! Drives me nuts. And sometimes I think Dumbledore is the most irresponsible grown-up on the planet! Goodness gracious!

3. The movies are incredibly well cast. Normally I am bothered when re-reading after seeing the movie version of something b/c I can't find the characters the way I had imagined them again. I don't mind with these. Who else could Snape be but Alan Rickman? Love him! The only "miss" - and it isn't their fault - is poor Neville Longbottom. No way anyone could have anticipated that growth spurt! It does make it hard to read him as mousy and timid and so forth when that huge hulking kid is in my head.

4. The stuff about Harry's parents is much harder to read now that I am a parent myself. 'Nuff said about that.

5. I still don't like the more kiddy aspects of the book. Namely, the cave troll and the troll boogers on Harry's wand. Yeah, kinda funny, but also stupid. I blame the movie for this moment bugging me more this time around. They made too big a deal of it. But then, I'm not the target demographic, am I?

I wonder if it is possible to discuss the books apart from the movies at this point. The books are better, but the movies are improving. They're finding the heart the books have had all along, which is what makes them so wonderful. I love Harry's discoveries of life - friendship and learning and everything else. I can't wait until E is seven and we can start reading these books together (seven is the age J.K. Rowling herself feels is the right one to start, so I'll trust her on that).

Onto the next (which is really the same book all over again. Things don't really get rocking and rolling until book three)!

Monday, July 18, 2016

Stitch Fix #1!


So...yeah...it's been a loooong time on this blog. So long I kinda forgot I had it. But it still exists and it seems like the perfect place to post about my entree into the world of Stitch Fix. I joined courtesy of my friend, Katie and the below paragraph is copied directly from her fantastic blog: https://alltheserenity.wordpress.com/ (other than the referral link - that's mine b/c I'm not that selfless).

If you are not familiar with Stitch Fix, here’s the deal: Stitch Fix is an online personal styling service. You can subscribe for regular Fixes or just schedule them as you like. You fill out an extensive online profile of your tastes, sizes, and budget preferences and for a $20 fee, one of their stylist puts together a box of 5 clothing and accessory items to ship right to your door! You have 3 days to try things on, solicit opinions, balance your budget, whatever — you send back anything that doesn’t work for you in a prepaid envelope, and keep whatever you love! Your $20 styling fee is applied to anything you decide to keep, and if you buy the whole box of items you get 25% off the entire box! Prices vary but they say the average cost per item is $55 – 65. If you haven’t ever tried it and are interested, please consider using my referral link. If you use my link to schedule a Fix, I get a $25 credit towards my next purchase! (Note that I do not receive any compensation for reviewing this service; I just enjoy doing it).

So why am I doing this? For a long time, I was a devoted shopper at a local boutique in my little town. I have lots of fun pieces from there. But lately, the owner seems to be catering much more to the teen crowd (she's always done a thriving prom dress business) and those styles don't work for me. She is also hiring a lot of teenagers who will tell me things look great on me that don't. And I don't need that. So it was time for a change. Plus I don't really like shopping all that much. Therefore having someone else do it for me and it comes right to my house is a win-win all around.

In my style profile, I checked off a lot of casual/boho looks. Since I don't work outside the home, I don't need clothes suitable for the office, which means I can just get a lot of fun stuff. I also finally joined the dark side, aka Pinterest, and started pinning looks I like, which includes a whole lot of Cosima from "Orphan Black." Apparently all her stuff comes from Anthropologie, in case I ever feel like venturing to the mall. But onto the actual clothes!

First up: the THML Sanuk Lattice Detail Top. I thought this was going to be white b/c I peeked at my Fix before it arrived and googled all the stuff and every picture of this top was white. But it was navy with a red stripe. My stylist, Staci, recommended pairing this shirt with the jeans she sent, but I started with the pants I had on (white linen from Old Navy). (BTW - full disclosure, my 9 year-old daughter took most of these pictures so the quality is what it is!)







I liked it with the white pants - it's a nice flowy summer look. However, the top is fairly sheer, even in the dark color, and I have LOTS of navy tops already. So then I tried it with the Dear John Kyleigh Straight Leg Jean she sent.




Meh. I actually tried it on again later with some other bottoms and while I liked it, I didn't LOVE it. My daughter just said it didn't seem like my style. I realized there are lots of tops out there so...VERDICT: RETURN.

But here is more of the jeans:




I really like the way these fit up top. But they are kinda wide at the bottom - too wide to be really straight leg. Katie's comment was: "I love the way they fit you above the knee, but the wide leg/wide cuff around your dainty ankles feels a little Huckleberry Finn." My husband agreed. Plus they were too short to do anything except cuff them. There are better jeans out there. So even though you will continue to see these jeans in the pictures...VERDICT: RETURN.

Next up: the Diaz Crochet Detail Top. Another shirt I thought was coming in white. But it, too, is navy.





I so wanted to love this shirt. I SHOULD love this shirt. As soon as he saw it in the pile, the husband said it looked like a me shirt. But...no. The shoulders are fussy and weirdly poofy. Husband thought I had shoulder pads in. I have wide shoulders already so that's no good. Katie referred to it as "grandma chic" - she got the same shirt in white and sent it back.





So, alas, VERDICT: RETURN

But then we got to the Loveappella Contrast Trim Knit Top.






Yes all around from everyone. So fun. I love the fit, the feel, the look. VERDICT: KEEP!

Last up, the Loveappella Deanne Printed Maxi Skirt.





I love maxi skirts and dresses. Love them, love them, love them. The colors in this one are great - plenty of choices to pair with a top: black, white, tan, blue, maroon. It's super comfy and fits really well. VERDICT: KEEP!`

And there it is. My first fix and my first attempt at blogging about it. Full disclosure: I keep looking at Katie's blog and wanting to copy everything about it b/c it's all great. But she just hit Fix #40 and this is only my first, so I'll let myself be okay with the uninteresting formatting and tweak things as we go along. And it's nice to have this blog back in action...maybe someday I'll even write about books again.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Sister: A Waste of My Time

I recently did something I never do. I read a book because there was an advertisement for it in the New York Times Book Review. Not a review. Just an ad. With blurbs. That made it sound like a good book. I was duped.

I also blame many of the Goodreads readers since I checked out what some of them were saying before I read the book. My opinion of Goodreads readers has now gone down a bit.

I know I have no one to blame but myself and rest assured that I will never do something so silly again. I remember seeing ads for books on the subway and thinking what a weird thing it is to advertise books that way. Who would read a book on a billboard? It wasn't like I ever saw some great book that everyone was raving about on the subway station ads. Usually thrillers and such. Which isn't really my genre and so I was sucked in even more by the Goodreads review that called it something like a thriller for people who don't like thrillers. They made it sound literary.

Again, no one but myself to blame.

So anyway. The book is Sister: A Novel by Rosamund Lupton. And right away we have the first thing that annoyed me. The "A Novel" thing after the colon. Really? You needed to tell me that? I wouldn't have figured it out even though the book is, you know, fiction?

It started vaguely promising (I'm not going to do a plot recap at all - if you care enough, you can go on Amazon or Goodreads and find one). Seemed well enough written with interesting things like:

"No, from the start I was clearly a Beatrice, sensible and unembellished in Times New Roman, with no one hiding inside. Dad chose the name Arabella before I was born. The reality must have been a disappointment." p. 3
and

"But that’s what his “discretion” always was – disownership hiding behind a more acceptable noun." p. 13

But then things started to horribly wrong. The narrator is supposed to be some kind of marketing person living in New York. So every color is described by its Panetone number with some vague commentary about how to ordinary people it looked like beige, but was actually Panetone number blah blah blah. And then as if this wasn't annoying enough, it gets dropped midway through in favor of random literary references that just need to show how smart she (whether author or narrator I'm not sure) is. And THEN she decides that what she really always wanted to be an architect. Okay then. What's next? I always wanted to be a lumberjack!

 

But I digress.

After a while (a short while), I gave up trying to underline anything of interest and instead just starting making the Kindle version of margin notes. And I love that you can do that in library books, btw. I think it is actually amusing to see those notes so here you go:

Me: Clinque, Panetone, Pixar – these brand names are so jarring especially when the rest of the writing is quite good. At times.
p. 11 (Ah, so naive and hopeful)

Me: Really? Triffids? p. 32 (Seriously, I have to agree with me here. Triffids??? Who does that?)

Me: And now sudden random literary references: Mad Hatter, Auden, Ancient Mariner p. 56 (But it's too late to impress me. You already said triffids)

"…boiling up the bunnies "
Me: sigh… p. 73

"…Chagall print in the kitchen"
Me: Fine art now! p. 77

"They actually use words like that: “saving” and “owing her life to,” comic-book words that are in danger of turning me into someone who wears pants on the outside of her tights, switches outfits and personas in telephone booths and has web coming out of her wrists."
Me: That’s how you do it. p. 105 (I think the point I was trying to make there was that you didn't need to work so hard on name dropping the pop culture references, that you could find a broader theme that the reader then renders specific in his/her own mind)

"…Kafkaesque turned ordinary"
Me: Ummmm…okay p. 141

"I hadn’t been in a public place since you’d died and the loud voices and the laughter made me feel vulnerable."
Me: Doesn’t she work in a bar? p. 151 (Yeah, about that one. One of the first things she does is go take her dead sister's job at the bar b/c that happens a lot. And aren't bars full of, let me see, loud voices and laughter? What the hell?)

"I reminded you I studied literature, didn’t I?"
Me: ugh p. 190

"She was framed for her own suicide."
Me: Huh??? p. 227 (If someone can explain this to me, I'm happy to listen.)

"Not just a double but a triple negative. His oratory wasn’t an impressive as he believed it to be."
Me: Thank you for the commentary. p. 238 (Pot, meet Kettle)

"…Proust’s tea-soaked petites madeleines"
Me: sigh… p. 246

"Surely a good therapist should produce a Dorian Gray-style portrait from under the couch so the patient can see the person they really are."
Me: Stop trying so hard!!!p. 260

"We get to St. James’s Park, which looks like that scene from Mary Poppins, all blossom and buds and blue sky with white meringue clouds. "
Me: No. p. 272 (What if I, the reader, have never seen Mary Poppins?)

"I thought of Donne chastising the busy old fool of a sun for making him leave his lover and marveled that his poetry now applied to me."
Me: pllltthhh p. 293


Really makes you want to go read it, doesn't it? What is even more mystifying is that I went and found the New York Times review of this and they seemed to like it. So clearly part of my problem is that I just don't like thrillers. I'm not much of a beach read person. I know it's an art form in its own right to be able to produce such page turners, but they just don't do it for me.

At least I didn't buy the book!

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Flashback Review

Note to self - do not start a new blog right at the beginning of the holiday season. Self will not have enough to time to actually read books, let alone post about them in any coherent fashion, especially once The Child is out of school.

So, with that said, I'm going to repost one of the original reviews from when I had this blog way long ago. It's for the fourth Harry Potter book, Goblet of Fire, and a review which for some reason people seemed to enjoy a lot on Goodreads.

Hope everyone had a good holiday season. As soon as I can organize my thoughts, I'll post a new review. In the meantime, from August 2007...



Now THAT'S a book!  The groove that J.K. Rowling starts to find in HP 3 is fully realized in 4.  Partly it's that the kids (and therefore the readers) are getting older so she can delve into more adult, complex themes and situations, and partly it's that I think she's really finding her voice.  We finally got our very own HP's, I am happy to report, and it's so funny to look at them all side by side b/c of the HUGE leap in size between 3 and 4.  Then they get a little tricky b/c while 4 and 5 look to be about the same length, the font in Order of the Phoenix is much smaller, hence a longer book.  I just started that one and it honestly feels longer already.  More of a book book and less of a fun afternoon's diversion.  But I like these books as they get both darker and longer.

But to focus on Goblet of Fire specifically for a moment...again, not that I think I can bring anything new to the table in discussing these books.  Nevertheless, I'll throw a few ideas out there just for your reading pleasure.  One thing that struck me, as I mentioned before, was the increasing maturity and complexity of situations and themes.  Clearly having someone die is a huge deal and I found that whole series of events really moving this time around.  I may have last time as well, but I don't remember.  In a way, though, some of the more complex issues feel jarring next to the goofy concepts she originally created.  Calling non-magical people "Muggles," for instance.  It's just a stupid word and yes, it sounds funny and makes kids laugh, but sometimes it's hard to take all these people seriously.  "Mud-bloods" on the other hand is vicious and definitely drives the point home.  I just wonder if she was to do it over again if some of those terms or ideas would change a bit.  Yes, we'd all like to revisit what we did/wrote when we were less sure of ourselves and our voices and ideas, but of course we can't and neither can she.  And what do I know?  She claims she always knew what would happen to Harry, so maybe for her "Muggle" is the ideal word.

Since, as usual, I find it impossible to discuss the books without referencing the films, let me just say that although I hated Dobby in the movie (2?) and was glad to see him mostly cut from subsequent screen incarnations, I really loved him in this one.  The dialogue is actually quite funny and Hermione's whole S.P.E.W. thing just cracks me up.  Yes, I know a lot of people hate it and find it annoying and whatever, but I love it.  Of course she would have a cause like that.  That's who she is!  And poor Winky.  They're weird creatures (and OH how I love Kreacher in the next one!) and I can't decide whether I am with Hermione or everyone else on their "plight."  Either way, I like that they exist; they provide a bit of moral ambiguity in a world that is mostly cleanly divided between good and evil.  You might wonder about people, but for the most part they end up squarely one or the other.  Other than Snape - another great piece of moral ambiguity whose complexity grows from book to book.

I also continue to marvel at Rowling's ability to write about the teenage mind.  Ron and Harry's fight is spot on, as are Hermione's various reactions to it.  And oh these poor boys having to ask the girls to the feast.  I wish I had known when I was in middle school how truly hard it was for boys to talk to girls like that.  Although I probably wouldn't have cared, being the good self-involved teenger that I was.

I still want to go to Hogwarts.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Into the Woods


Two confessions. One: it has taken me forever to write about Nightwoods by Charles Frazier. I finished it probably the same day I posted about Wilder Life and here we are, at least a week later, with me just starting to try to write about it. I don’t know why the avoidance. Perhaps actually writing about it will help unravel the mystery (okay, to be fair, I was in tech for a show all last week, so that might have been part of it, but I prefer to think it was something in the book itself!).

Second confession: I was very late to the Cold Mountain party. I heard nothing about the book when it first came out (because I live under a rock apparently) and later all I knew of it was a movie with Jude Law and Nicole Kidman, neither of whom are enough to propel me to a movie theater ever. However, eventually I picked it up and LOVED IT. Instant convert. What an amazing book - history, beautiful writing, wonderful characters...and all based on actual family lore. It made me want to write my great great grandmother's story in the same sort of sweeping, historical fiction kind of way - well, I still want to do that, but let's try to be realistic, shall we? I even finally watched the movie and it was far better than it had any right to be. I still don't much care for Jude Law and Nicole Kidman, but the movie was good.

So I was excited when Charles Frazier came out with a new book this year, Nightwoods, and the reviews were very good (he had another book in there somewhere, but I haven't read it - if you have, let me know if I should!). And it was good. It just wasn't Cold Mountain. So I think that has left me not sure what to say about it.

On its face, the story is kind of obvious and almost caricaturish what with the redneck relatives and the backwoods setting and potentially heartwarming ending all due to the love of children. Amazon certainly does the book no favors with this description: "Before the children, Luce was content with the reimbursements of the rich Appalachian landscape, choosing to live apart from the small community around her. But the coming of the children changes everything, cracking open her solitary life in difficult, hopeful, dangerous ways." Trust me, if I hadn't loved Cold Mountain, I wouldn't have gone near this book based on THAT!

But Charles Frazier is an incredibly talented writer, so he does lift the novel above that. Here are just a few examples:
The place spoke of time. How you’re here and then you’re gone, and all you leave for a little while afterward are a few artifacts that outlive you. Loc. 77
 Easy to be disdainful and ironic toward others’ false values. Loc. 85
 She might have been tall and willowy when she was young, before time compressed her into herself, thickening and shortening and bending year by year until all you could see of the young woman she had been were her quick blue eyes, faded almost to the color of steel. Loc. 209
 Now Luce lay awake in the dark, knowing Maddie’s murder ballads addressed exactly that situation, and taught that the flame of urgent coupling burned hottest against the women, no matter how romantic and high and heartsick the anguish of the man might be pitched in retrospect. Loc.227
He also gets huge points for echoing one of my favorite beliefs in life: "Probably, if you breaded cardboard in cornmeal and and fried it in lard, it would taste pretty good too." Loc. 580 (I generally apply this axiom to a paper napkin, but the sentiment is the same)

I think I came away from the book a little confused, though, because a lot of the deepest thoughts (for lack of a better phrase) seemed to come from the villain(s) of the book. What is the nature of truth? Why are we here? Can people really change?

The meaning of the necklace could be summed into one useful idea – adapted from the possibly true fact that sharks die if they stop swimming forward – useful for every single misstep in life. Move on. And the meaning of the tattoo was equally brief, and no argument about it. Everybody dies. Loc. 289

People don’t change, Lola said. Maybe you’re still young enough to pretend that’s not true. People are who they are, and everybody around them has to take it or go somewhere else.  Loc. 2871
 Truth isn’t in your own self, and it sure isn’t in theirs. Whatever you tell me or I tell you, and call it truth, is nothing but convenient feelings and asswipe opinions. Real truth is way beyond people. Our brains weren’t tuned to get but a glimpse of it off in the distance 
     -- No. That’s not the way it is.
     -- Yeah, that is the way it is. People love the word, but all the use it for is like a club to beat you with. If we ever had the truth in our heads, we couldn’t live with it. But because we’re friends, I’m happy to hear about your feelings and opinions, and maybe tell a few of my own, as long as we agree to call things by their right names. Loc. 2984
Lots of big questions put out there, but only the bad guys seem to have any answers or opinions. The heroine, Luce, just kind of floats along until she is forced back into real life and into confronting her past by the arrival of the children and a guy - and again, good thing the writing is fantastic because, ugh. I mean, just read that last sentence again. Ugh! Aren't there other ways that women can confront their past and get excited about the future again? Are the two options to have a pseudo family thrust upon you or to become a hermit forever?

I realize this makes it sound like I didn't like the book and I did. I really did. I loved the writing, I enjoyed the characters. But I think writing this post is helping me figure out the avoidance (I knew it!) - I am just not sure what the basic message is here. And that bugs me. Something wasn't fleshed out enough or examined deeply enough or given enough depth of thought. Is he just not good at writing women? I don't remember thinking that about Cold Mountain, but then, I wasn't trying to write about it either. Maybe he is just a really, really good romance writer. After all, even in her hermitage, Luce ends up with a wine cellar full of excellent vintage wine so she can have those nice evenings with the guy. Does it bug me? I guess so. But on some level, it doesn't matter when there is writing like this:

Luce poured two glasses of red wine from a basement bottle with a mildewed French label. Old and awfully good and autumnal in the November sundown with brown frost-bit apples still hanging from bare limbs in the orchard and a fingernail radius of yellow moon following the sun to the horizon. Leaves covered the grass. Something yet trilled in the woods, a final katydid or frog. A bit in the air, and not a cloud in the sky. Bands of soft color glowed above the westward peaks. Peach and apricot and sepia, fading in pretty degrees to blue and finally indigo straight up. Expressed as art, the colors would lay on the canvas entirely unnatural and sentimental, and yet they were a genuine manifestation of place many evenings in the fall. Loc. 3097



Friday, November 18, 2011

Oh Manly, I Love You So Much

I had originally intended to re-start this blog in January as one of those New Year's kind of things, but then I read THIS BOOK and I knew I had to start right away.

Our first book is The Wilder Life: My Adventures in the Lost World of Little House on the Prairie by Wendy McClure and for the love of Half Pint, it is fabulous! Laugh out loud funny and spot on for a kid of the 70's, which I am. Amazon describes it thus:

"Wendy McClure is on a quest to find the world of beloved Little House on the Prairie author Laura Ingalls Wilder-a fantastic realm of fiction, history, and places she's never been to, yet somehow knows by heart. She retraces the pioneer journey of the Ingalls family- looking for the Big Woods among the medium trees in Wisconsin, wading in Plum Creek, and enduring a prairie hailstorm in South Dakota. She immerses herself in all things Little House, and explores the story from fact to fiction, and from the TV shows to the annual summer pageants in Laura's hometowns. Whether she's churning butter in her apartment or sitting in a replica log cabin, McClure is always in pursuit of "the Laura experience." Along the way she comes to understand how Wilder's life and work have shaped our ideas about girlhood and the American West."
Yeah, okay, I guess you could describe it that way, but it sounds so serious, right? Based on that description, my enthusiasm was a bit limited and I put off reading it for a quite a while (it came out last spring, I think). Big mistake. Huge. (Pretty Woman, anyone?) I read it in about two days and it would have been less if I hadn't had all those pesky real life things to do. I could not put it down. Hilarious.
Wendy McClure is about my age and actually went to the same high school as The Husband. I was very excited when I realized this and went running for his yearbooks, but she graduated the year before he started. Bummer. Anyway, she and I completely see LHOP the same way and I very much appreciated not only her similar view of books that I loved so much, but also her sense of humor about it, which is heavily laced with sarcasm. I'm a big fan of sarcasm, something that is in oddly short supply here in the heartland. Makes me nuts. They're all so sincere. Don't they realize that sarcasm is the Northeast way of saying you care?
But I digress. So, Wendy (I don't think she'd mind if I call her Wendy, do you?) is a big fan of the books and always wanted to be Laura when she was growing up. Me too! For Halloween when I was about 7 or so, I dressed up as Laura, complete with a sunbonnet purchased at the Dutch Pantry in Mansfield PA. Because my hair is reddish blonde, people automatically assumed I was Mary, not Laura, and I was very put out by this, as I'm sure Wendy would have been too. “But Mary is also so insufferably dull that it makes Laura’s badness seem quite reasonable, especially to those of us with an inner girl who likes to let down her sunbonnet once in a while. Which is to say, most of us.” Loc. 1161 (I read the book on the Kindle and I don't know what the etiquette is for quoting...anyone?)
As an adult, Wendy starts reading the books again and eventually goes on a quest to find out all about the real life locations and about Laura herself. Now, in the late 90's, I was living in western Massachusetts and definitely at a crossroads in my life. For whatever reason, I started checking all the Little House books out of the local library and re-reading them or reading some of them for the first time since in my actual youth the later books all bored me. I liked young, adventurous Laura, not older, marrying and settling down Laura, a feeling I think certain others might share: “In my mind, the world of the Little House books just went up in smoke at the end, their heroine disappearing into clumsy ordinariness and ignominy. It had always trailed off with a vague, unspoken disappointment. It’s the kind of story we learn over and over again about everything in the world: your life starts out as a wild open frontier that you explore until the forces of time or history or civilization or nature intervene, and then suddenly it’s all gone, it all weathers and falls down and gets built over; everyone dies or moves away or becomes a grainy photograph, and yes, at some point you just get fat and fall off a streetcar. Progress – it dumps you on your aging and gigantic ass!” Loc. 360
The library let me down when it was time for Farmer Boy and I was very worked up about this and complained to the high school students I was directing in a play at the time. I'm sure they thought I was crazy, but that did not stop them from buying a hardcover copy of Farmer Boy and signing it for my director's gift. One of the best gifts I've ever received, actually.
This was before the internet was The Internet, so I couldn't avail myself of the full world of crazy that Wendy McClure found and I think I'm happier that way. I'm jealous of her travels and would still like to make the trip(s) someday, probably when The Child is a little older and hopefully wants to go herself. I think I would have been horrified and disappointed at the types that share Laura World (Who knew it was such a favorite among the home schooling crowd? “They were all nice folks who shared my love of Laura but maybe not my support for legalizing gay marriage.” Loc. 2564), so it's good that I am now prepared for this. It was fascinating to see how much of the story is real and how much more is not. Like most people, I think, I've always assumed they books were basically autobiographical and didn't Laura have such an amazing life? Amazing, yes. True...maybe not so much. And I guess that's okay. But now I am reading them with The Child, who is 5, and part of what she finds cool about these books is that the people in them really lived, which is true, and all these things actually happened. Not sure what to do with that. Suddenly LHOP has entered Santa Claus realm. When do you tell the children the truth???
Another wonderful thing for me in this book was Wendy's utter disdain for the TV show. I loathed the TV show as a kid and it was my first experience of how much books can change when they are put into movie or TV form. It's not good and it has nothing whatsoever in common with the books, other than the character names. Some of them. Who is Albert? What is he doing there? Why is he addicted to morphine? I don't understand!!!! Like Wendy, though, I did develop something of a weird affection for it as I got older. For some reason in college, my friend, Louisa, and I took to watching it a lot. Our very favorite - or at least the one we remember - was the episode called "Annabelle," where the circus comes to town and Mr. Oleson is all ashamed because his sister, the titular Annabelle, is the fat lady in the circus! Horrors! This is not what makes the episode awesome, however. It's when Laura is mooning about over Almanzo and trying to figure out how to invite him to the circus. One of her practice lines: "Oh, Manly, I love you so much. Please go to the circus with me." It's amazing they ever got together and you have to think it only happens because the book said so. You can see the actual moment right here. It is in the first minute and it’s AWESOME. But you kind of knew that, since it’s been 20+ years since I watched that episode and I still remember it. (Don't know why I can't embed on this one. Bummer)
But the best thing about this book is the love for LHOP, for Laura World, and for all that those things embody. Even with all the craziness, or maybe in spite of it, I still want to sit down and re-read every one of them again. I look forward to sharing more of these books with my daughter and hope that someday she wants to read this book too. Whether Laura's life really happened that way or not doesn't really matter. "Sometimes, Laura World wasn’t a realm of log cabins or prairies, it was a way of being. Really, a way of being happy.” Loc. 2321